The Comparison Between Probing Prompting Learning Model and Problem Based Learning Model on Grade VIII Students’ Learning Achievement SMPN 1 Cempa

Awaliah, Nur and Sanusi, Wahidah and Aswi, Aswi (2021) The Comparison Between Probing Prompting Learning Model and Problem Based Learning Model on Grade VIII Students’ Learning Achievement SMPN 1 Cempa. In: the International Conference on Educational Studies in Mathematics (ICoESM 2021), 13 December 2021.

	Text (Article Proceeding International) 14_Awaliah_Wahidah_Aswi_The Comparison Between Probing Prompting Learning Model and PBL Model on Grade VIII Students’ Learning Achievement SMPN 1 Cempa.pdf - Published Version Download (449kB)
	Text (Form Penilaian Proceeding International) 14_Form_The Comparison Between Probing Prompting Learning Model and PBL Model on Grade VIII Students’ Learning Achievement SMPN 1 Cempa.pdf - Additional Metadata Download (2MB)
	Text (Turnitin Proceeding International) 14_Turnitin_The Comparison Between Probing Prompting Learning Model and PBL Model on Gra.pdf - Additional Metadata Download (476kB)

Abstract

This study aims to compare students’ learning achievement between students who were taught mathematics by using probing prompting learning model and problem-based learning model in grade VIII SMPN 1 Cempa. The population of this research is the whole students of grade VIII SMPN 1 Cempa. The sample is conducted using random cluster sampling, where VIII1 is applied problem-based learning model, and VIII2 is applied probing prompting learning model. The instruments are consist of observation, questionnaires, and learning achievement tests. Data analysis techniques are descriptive analysis and inferential analysis by using SPSS 24 application for windows. Based on data analysis by using N-gain, both models are in the performing well category. The increasing average of probing prompting model class is 0.77 while problem-based learning model class is 0.76. The hypothesis testing is conducted using a t-test (independent sample test) with the level of significance α = 0.05 that compares the N-gain value from both experimental classes. As a result, the significant value is 0.571>0.05, which means the P-value is greater than the significance level of 5%. Based on the inferential analysis, H0 is accepted, and H1 is rejected. Finally, it is concluded that there are no differences in increasing average result of students’ learning achievement between students that taught mathematics by using probing prompting learning model and problem-based learning model in grade VIII SMPN 1 Cempa.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Speech)
Subjects:	FMIPA > STATISTIKA - (S1) FMIPA FMIPA > Matematika KARYA ILMIAH DOSEN Universitas Negeri Makassar > KARYA ILMIAH DOSEN
Divisions:	KOLEKSI KARYA ILMIAH UPT PERPUSTAKAAN UNM MENURUT FAKULTAS > KARYA ILMIAH DOSEN KARYA ILMIAH DOSEN
Depositing User:	Dr. Aswi Aswi
Date Deposited:	17 Jul 2022 07:16
Last Modified:	17 Jul 2022 07:16
URI:	http://eprints.unm.ac.id/id/eprint/23870

Actions (login required)

View Item